Chapter 1 | ||
Summary: | Genesis begins by telling us how God* begins to create both heaven and earth from a shapeless mass in the dark in seven days.
| |
Notes: | 1.) "God" is not defined, other than we are to assume he is a creator of some sort. 2.) The source of light, how long it is allowed to shine, why and what causes it to stop, are all not specified 3.) The moon is not a light, or a source of light. It simply reflects light from the sun. 3.) The sun as we now know is a star itself, and is not the largest of them. The moon is quite smaller than a star, yet both the sun and moon are referred to as "huge lights". 4.) Although the bible often misclassifies winged mammals as "birds" (e.g. the bat) and that we can probably chalk this up to the Hebrew language (meaning that the Hebrew word for "bird" may simply mean "flying animal" which would include bats, etc.) - the bible is making it clear here that animals of the sea and the air were created first, whereas science and fossil records show that in addition to sea life, reptiles (which have yet to be created) predate birds and are the earliest known forms of life. | |
Thoughts: | Already in the first chapter we come at odds with modern science and archaeological evidence. The earliest fossils that we have found tell us that life most probably began in the sea, and evolved into reptilian life, contrary to Genesis claiming that birds predate reptiles - discarding the time frame of a "day". Now while it is simply *possible* that we just may not have found fossils to support that birds predate reptiles, the problem is that there is no evidence outside of the written word of the bible to support that claim. Lack of evidence is certainly cause for skepticism. Secondly, we have an obvious paradox with the creation of light, "daytime", and "nighttime" three days before the creation of the sun (and stars). Perhaps God created a simple mythical flashlight and modeled the sun after it, but the bible doesn't explain this and guessing is subjective at best. Also, without the heat of the sun, the waters would be frozen by the lack of heat and would prove a hindrance in "separating the vapors" to make the sky. The plants, grass, and fruit trees made on day three would also die without the sun, making "God's flashlight" pretty much a necessary substitution for this story to hold true. It could be possible that God is holding this all together in some sort by his boundless supernatural powers, but this is not explained or mentioned and is again subjective. Another problem with the story versus modern science is the creation of reptiles on the same day as human beings, as once again our fossil records don't support this. Again, while it could be *possible* that we simply have not found human fossils dating as far back as our reptilian fossils, we lack that evidence to support the claim as made here in Genesis. | |
Chapter 2 | ||
Summary: |
The chapter continues on to give a summary of the past 7 days of creations, which in actuality is more of an elaboration. It claims:
| |
Notes: | 1.) It's also worth noting again that the sun (which has yet to be created) isn't mentioned as a factor. 2.) The problem here is that man yet to grasp the concept of "right or wrong" and has only God's threat of being "doomed to die" as reasoning to avoid the fruit from the tree. God seems to be tempting and/or coaxing the man to disobey him by explaining what knowledge will be gained (a conscience of right and wrong) and by placing this tree in the garden to begin with. 3.) In chapter one, it seems clear that God had made the animals first, then man (and woman) to be masters over the animals. In this chapter God makes man from the dust, and then makes the animals from the dust to bring to the man to see what he would name them. 4.) Why God resorts to creating the woman from the man's rib and not the dust from the ground is not specifically explained - unless we assume that it was God's intention to make marriage seem like the man is "complete" again. 5.) Here we have to infer that there would be some reason for the man and his wife to be ashamed and embarrassed of their nudity. In the context of the story there is no reason for this other than to imply that nudity is simply "wrong" in the first place. | |
Thoughts: | Already we have a contradiction with the first chapter (the order of the creation of man versus animals), we have God placing Adam (and his wife) in a tempting and unnecessary situation and threatening him with death as a way to coerce him into obeying, and already (unbeknownst to the man and his wife) making nudity a shameful idea - despite man (and presumably woman) being modeled after God's own image. To me, even so far, it seems quite apparent that this story was concocted by men of a later age where nudity was shameful and who were ignorant of the actual roles and characteristics of the sun, the moon, and stars - rather than divinely inspired, or divinely written. It's also hard to think of God's characteristics as being all loving and compassionate when he's already threatening Adam with death for disobeying him (and basically entrapping him to do so) instead of simply giving him the ability to discern right from wrong. With Adam's lack of experience and young age (yet presumably an adult) it is natural that we should probably think of him more on terms with a child, and threatening a child with death for disobeying something he does not fully comprehend or understand is not compassionate but cruel and excessive punishment. |
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
GENESIS: Chapters 1 & 2
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment